Comments on: I Just Haven’t Read You Yet

By: 3clair

3clair — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:21:45 +0000

I think Madam recommended Niklaus Wirth’s book in Data Structure class.. hmm.. but I can’t be sure. I have taken a peek at this book and it is quite interesting. The Art of Computer Programming by Donald Knuth?? It consists of 3 books, right?? Hm.. those are good books, I think. Maybe you should buy this rather than the Sinaga one :P

By: Elfira Y S

Elfira Y S — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:09:29 +0000

Was Niklaus Wirth’s book recommended by Madam? Never heard of it. Hmm..
I remember the one she mentioned was The Art of Computer Programming.

By: 3clair

3clair — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:36:04 +0000

What a weird name this Sinaga book is. The first thought came to me was “Eragon” :P

I think it is interesting book, but you should consider Niklaus Wirth book about data structure.

Anyway.. won’t Michael Buble join Sinaga family if, for very very unusual circumstances, marry you?? :P

By: Elfira Y S

Elfira Y S — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:15:16 +0000

@Mika:
No, I won’t let Michael Buble join Sinaga family. That way I lose my chance to marry him. Lalalalala…

@Rika:
I have no plan to shop a computer textbook per year, jeng. I really really do have interest in this Sinaga book (hey, this sounds nice, too!). Hmm.. but who knows.. maybe next year, it’s gonna be Tom Mitchell’s Machine Learning! *be still, my brain! you can do it, my brain! Thx, jeng!

By: rika

rika — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:04:38 +0000

I think you should stick to the plan that you will buy one computer book (whatever it is) per year, at the end of the year. So for now, the candidate is still that Sinaga book. Maybe along the way you will find another textbook you’re interest.

By: ravimalekinth

ravimalekinth — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:22:30 +0000

1. The name of the book is very strange. Dragon book? How come the dragon related to the computer? (maybe it is, I just take a quick glance at Wikipedia).

2. What is the relation between Michael Buble and Dragon? Maybe he has “Dragon” as his family name?

Michael Buble Sinaga? :)) :)) :))

3. No wonder that all of your college-textbook is pirated. But, maybe you could also find the pirated version of Michael Buble there :)) :)) :)) :))

(Jaka Sembung carry a sword does not related [Jaka sembung bawa golok, ngga nyambung bok!])

By: Elfira Y S

Elfira Y S — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:30:48 +0000

From the bottom of my heart:I hate you, Ted.

But thank you, as always..

Darn, you are really getting better these days..

By: ajid

ajid — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:14:31 +0000

A part of a sentence stole my attention:
“..someone would met with Michael Buble..”
1. I’m pretty sure it’s supposed to be “meet” instead of “met”
2. I wonder why you put “with” between meet and Michael. I thought “would meet Michael” was enough. Then I searched for an answer myself before asking you (I blame my excessive passion in English for that!). I found this interesting article. It says meet with “with” is for formal use, while meet without “with” (without with? :D) is much more common expression than the earlier one. Hmm.. what do you think?
3. The last but the most important, I do really hope that someone would meet Michael Buble there!